¡Más Paranoia! ¡Más Conspiración!

Este post es para los que leyeron el ultimo post y pensaron, “que se valla a gritar a una esquina como un loco paranoico”.

Un grupo de distinguidos académicos, investigadores y especialistas incluyendo Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Morgan Reynolds , Wayne Madsen y Andreas von Buelow han concluido que el gobierno estadounidense esta participando en una conspiración para ocultar los hechos detrás del los atentados del 11 de Septiembre estadounidense.

Han formado un grupo llamado Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Estan convencidos que ninguna de las explicaciones oficiales son verdad y que en realidad el gobierno cometió un auto-atentado.

Acá va el informe.

Están pidiendo que los medios mundiales demandan evidencia científica en colaboración con universidades para verificar o falsificar –a través de una rigurosa investigación— la versión oficial de 911 como lo llaman en los Estados Unidos.

Afirman que si se hiciera esto se desmentiría una de las grandes engaños de la historia de la humanidad

Este informe de prensa detalla todo los puntos en disputa. Por ejemplo:

- En la historia de la ingeniería estructural (antes y después del 11 de Septiembre 2001), nunca se ha caído un rascacielos con estructura de hierro por causa de incendio.

- Frank De Martini, el Project manager del World Trade Center, dijo que los edificios fueron diseñados para resistir el impacto de naves aéreas y que tal choque tendría que haber sido como “perforar una red de mosquitos con un lápiz”. (Ver video)

-La temperatura a cual se derrite el acero es de aproximadamente 2.700 grados Fahrenheit y la temperatura de fuegos de combustible de aviones no excede 1.800 grados Fahrenheit.

Hay muchos más.

Yo sé que hay un puñado de periodistas que están leyendo este blog. Esta es una nota muy buena, aparte de tu posición ideológica, o que le creas o no a los investigadores.

Los datos de contacto del director del programa Scholars for 9/11 Truth son:

James Fetzer
University of Minnesota. EE.UU.
(218) 724-2706

Si están leyendo esto en sus redacciones ¿porque no proponen la nota a un editor? Seguro que te dice que sí, quedas como un duque, y difundís una información interesante y que genera debate interesante. Sería bueno, por ejemplo, comprobar de una vez por todas que esta gente esta equivocada y demente y que no hay ninguna conspiración. Ósea, contestar uno por uno los puntos de debate de su informe.

También lo pueden presentar como una nota de interés general, o de cultura pop: una especie de repaso de teorías de conspiración con el eje central siendo una entrevista a Fetzer.

Espero las notas. Si sale una mandenmela para que la pueda postear en Futuratrónics.

Foto: Del informe de National Geographic, Inside 9/11. Una excelente resumen, no paranoico, de este día.

Via: Plausible Futures

Futuratrónics cross-index: Stand by Manhattan

1 comentario:

Andrés Hax dijo...

Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax
Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an international consortium.

Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.

These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."

They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.

They are encouraging news services around the world to secure scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they believe, require extraordinary measures.

If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this nation from ever greater abuse.

They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might compensate for its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth about one of the great turning-point events of modern history.

Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have studied. They even believe there are good reasons for suspecting that video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden are not genuine.

They have found the government's own investigiation to be severely flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.

They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.

Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:

* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?

* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?

* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?

* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?

* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?

* Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?

* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?

* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?

* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?

* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible?

Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.

These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."