Un reciente articulo de Technology review titulado "Could Terrorists hi-jack your brain" (¿Podrían terroristas tomar rehén a su cerebro?) advierte que en un futuro cercano existirá la tecnología para poder interferir remotamente con un cuerpo y regular sus diferentes sistemas.
La nota se basa en un informe de un grupo basado en Washington sobre amenazas reales a la seguridad nacional estadounidense a corto plazo.
Imagen: still de la película Scanners de David Cronenberg, un cineasta fundamental futuratrónico.
Neurohacking
2.2.06
Neurohacking: this is your brain on bioregulators
Suscribirse a:
Comentarios de la entrada (Atom)
2 comentarios:
Wednesday, February 1, 2006
Could Terrorists Hijack Your Brain?
According to a new report on biosecurity, technological advances in the not-so-distant future may make it a possibility.
By Emily Singer
Security experts need to prepare for a much broader spectrum of potential bioterror agents, according to a report released this week by the Washington, DC-based National Academies.
Most bioweapons research has focused on traditional biological agents, such as anthrax and smallpox. But that focus is dangerously narrow, the report says; emerging technologies in biotechnology and the life sciences could be hijacked to take control of genes, immune systems, and even brains.
"The threat is extremely broad, and it is increasingly global," says Stanley M. Lemon, cochair of the advisory committee and director of the Institute for Human Infections and Immunity at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, TX.
In order to prepare for the ever-changing "threat spectrum," the report recommends that technologies with dual-use potential -- those that can be used to either help or harm humanity -- be continually reassessed to take account of rapid advances in biotechnology. The report also suggests that a scientific advisory board be developed to aid the national security community and to ensure that teams monitoring these threats have the most up-to-date scientific expertise.
Recognizing that the list of bioterror threats is constantly changing is itself a huge transition, says Drew Endy, a biological engineer at MIT and leader in the new field of synthetic biology. "It's like the transition from trench warfare to mobilized warfare between World War I and World War II," he says. "How do we begin to defend ourselves against that dynamic threat landscape? How do we adapt our health, medical, and biodefense systems to respond to that?"
The committee recommended broad measures -- ones that would be useful regardless of the form of attack -- such as strengthening the nation's public health infrastructure. The report also suggested incentives for the pharmaceutical and vaccine industries to create broadly active vaccines and other products that can protect against diverse agents.
Scientists who drafted the report were also particularly concerned about the potential of bioregulators -- small, biologically active organic compounds that can regulate different systems in the body. Newer technologies such as targeted delivery methods that zero in on the immune or neuroendocrine systems could make it easier to use bioregulators in insidious ways.
Terrorists could also co-opt relatively new technologies, such as synthetic biology, which aims to build organisms that can detect or produce chemicals or perform other functions; and RNA interference, a technique that allows scientists to easily control gene expression.
As these kinds of technologies become increasingly commonplace throughout the world, the international scientific community will need to take more responsibility for the potential abuses of biotechnology, according to the report. Josh Epstein, a committee member and senior fellow on economic studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC, says one option is a Web-based forum where scientists can report suspicious research.
The committee also endorsed an open exchange of information in the life sciences as much as possible, emphasizing that the best means of protecting against future threats is further advances in technology.
http://www.technologyreview.com/BioTech/wtr_16221,306,p1.html?PM=GO
Esta viene a ser la versión siglo XXI del viejo lavado de cerebro. Pero para todo hay un remedio, y paso a describir el que relataba una novela infantil editada en España en años de Franco. El protagonista de la novela, un niño llamado Luisito, era secuestrado por los rusos y llevado a Moscú, donde se lo sometía a un lavado de cerebro. Pero como Luisito era muy avispado, se la vio venir y consiguió una birome roja donde se escribió "la verdad de la milanesa" en la planta de los pies. Con el cerebro ya lavado, convencido de tener otra identidad y sobre todo de la bondad de los rusos que en realidad eran los malos de esta pseudopelícula, "casualmente" Luisito encontró su verdadera historia escrita en sus pies y así pudo volver a la acogedora realidad de la España de su tiempo.
En lugar de invertir tanto en prevención tecnológica antiterrorista, antes de que nos secuestren el cerebro tendríamos que aprender la refinada técnica de escribirnos la verdad en la planta de los pies. Qué cosa, aunque la verdad termine pisoteada. Y todos salvados de la nueva amenaza mundial.
Publicar un comentario